CROSS-LAYER SCHEDULING FOR WIDEBAND SYSTEMS in .NET

Build QR-Code in .NET CROSS-LAYER SCHEDULING FOR WIDEBAND SYSTEMS
CROSS-LAYER SCHEDULING FOR WIDEBAND SYSTEMS
scan qrcode with .net
Using Barcode Control SDK for .NET Control to generate, create, read, scan barcode image in .NET applications.
e1 NT CP User 1(m 1) CP User 1(m) CP User 1(m+1) CP User 1(m+2) ...
Qr-codes barcode library for .net
generate, create qr code jis x 0510 none with .net projects
User 2(m 1)
QR scanner in .net
Using Barcode decoder for .net framework Control to read, scan read, scan image in .net framework applications.
CP e2
scanning barcode in .net
Using Barcode decoder for Visual Studio .NET Control to read, scan read, scan image in Visual Studio .NET applications.
User 2(m)
Bar Code barcode library with .net
generate, create barcode none in .net projects
User 2(m+1)
Use qr code 2d barcode for .net c#
using barcode implement for .net vs 2010 control to generate, create qr code image in .net vs 2010 applications.
... Time
Denso QR Bar Code barcode library in .net
use asp.net web service qr code iso/iec18004 encoding toproduce qr-code on .net
Window of nf samples for DFT
Control qr code 2d barcode image for vb
using barcode drawer for .net vs 2010 control to generate, create qr code iso/iec18004 image in .net vs 2010 applications.
e1 CP User 1(m 1) CP User 1(m) CP User 1(m+1) ...
Add uss-128 with .net
using barcode encoder for visual .net control to generate, create ean / ucc - 14 image in visual .net applications.
User 2(m 1)
UCC - 12 barcode library on .net
use vs .net crystal upc-a supplement 2 writer touse upc barcodes in .net
User 2(m)
Code-39 generation in .net
generate, create ansi/aim code 39 none for .net projects
User 2(m+1)
VS .NET gs1 - 8 encodingwith .net
using visual .net togenerate ean8 for asp.net web,windows application
... Time
Control pdf417 size for word documents
to use pdf-417 2d barcode and pdf417 2d barcode data, size, image with office word barcode sdk
Window of nf samples e2 for DFT
Control code 128 code set b data on word
to incoporate barcode 128 and barcode standards 128 data, size, image with microsoft word barcode sdk
(b) Figure 10.13. OFDMA timing offset requirement with respect to ISI: (a) timing offset causing ISI (max(m1, m2) > Ncyclic - Lp); (b) timing offsets with no ISI (max(m1, m2) Ncyclic - Lp).
Control barcode data matrix size in c#
data matrix 2d barcode size with visual c#.net
nal spreading sequence to ensure good performance. On the other hand, for OFDMA-based systems, there is a exible tradeoff between the timing synchronization requirement of the K uplink users and the guard period allocated per OFDM symbols Ncyclic. Hence, we can always relax the timing synchronization requirement by increasing Ncyclic at the expense of higher overhead. 10.5.4 Effect of Frequency Offsets
Control code-39 data for visual c#
barcode 39 data in c#.net
To consider the effect of the residual frequency offsets on system performance, we expand Equation (10.54) as follows:
SUMMARY
Control data matrix 2d barcode image in visual basic.net
generate, create 2d data matrix barcode none with vb.net projects
j 2p 1 mNT ( (1 Ym1) = exp F1G ( 1 )Dm) (m 1 )h 1 nf j 2p k mNT + exp F1G ( nf k 1
GTIN - 13 barcode library with .net
using winforms tobuild ean / ucc - 13 for asp.net web,windows application
(k )Dm ) (m k )h k + F1w m
Control data matrix barcode data with word documents
to draw 2d data matrix barcode and data matrix barcode data, size, image with microsoft word barcode sdk
(10.56)
Hence, we can easily see that the frequency offsets from the K users 1, . . . , K will contribute to the multiuser interference in the DFT outputs. In the special case when 2 = 3 = . . . = K = 0, we have G(0) = I and F1D(k) (mk) = 0|B1| Lp. m Hence, the DFT outputs Y(1) for user 1 is free from the multiuser interference m terms and can be expressed as j 2p 1 mNT ( Ym1) = exp A(m 1 , nf where A(m 1 ,
1 1 ) = F1G ( 1 )D(m) (m1 ) 1
)h 1 + F1w m
(10.57)
In practice, the major contribution of the frequency offset is due to the local oscillators at the mobile transmitters and the base station receiver. Since the uplink and downlink offsets of the local oscillators are the same,4 the uplink frequency offset synchronization problem can be simpli ed by utilizing the downlink pilot. All the K mobiles estimate the combined frequency offsets with reference to a common pilot channel from the base station. Each mobile compensates for the frequency offsets in the uplink transmission on the basis of the downlink estimate. Typical residual frequency offset (normalized with respect to the subcarrier spacing fs) after compensation is of the order of 10-3. Hence, the frequency offset effect can be mitigated. Besides, from Equation (10.56), we can deduce that assigning a group of subcarriers to a user or introducing some empty subcarriers between band groups can help to enhance the robustness of the system with respect to multiuser interference due to frequency offsets. For example, the subcarrier allocation for user 1 and user 2 can be B1 = {1, 2, . . . , 32} and B2 = {34, 35, . . . , 40}. 10.6 SUMMARY
In this chapter,we have elaborated on the cross-layer design for wideband transmissions over frequency-selective fading channels. When the transmit bandwidth of the signal is much larger than the channel coherence bandwidth, there will be multiple distinct echos (frequency selective fading) in the receiver input, and this will result in ISI.We discuss two common and effective physical layer designs the DS-CDMA/MISO and OFDMA/MISO systems to combat frequency-selective fading channels. We consider a base
In typical transceiver design, the transmit and receive paths are clocked by the same oscillator.
CROSS-LAYER SCHEDULING FOR WIDEBAND SYSTEMS
station with nT transmit antennas and K mobiles (each with a single receive antenna). For DS-CDMA/MISO systems, information from the users is spread across both the temporal and spatial domains by a spreading matrix. As a result of the spreading action, the signals from a user occupies the entire wide transmission bandwidth and therefore achieves high-frequency diversity order (given by the number of resolvable multipaths Lp). It is shown that for suf ciently large spreading factor NSF and suf ciently large transmission bandwidth, the maximum data rate (in terms of Shannon s capacity) can be decomposed into nT independent scalar channels, and the capacity value approaches the ergodic capacity. In other words, the frequency diversity suppresses uctuations of user data rate and therefore does not allow multiuser diversity. On the other hand, OFDMA is the multiaccess extension of the regular OFDM systems where a user can be assigned a subset of the subcarriers depending on the instantaneous CSI. Together with the nT transmit antennas, there are nT spatial channels and nf frequency channels as system resources that can be assigned to some of the K mobile users. In other words, together with the cross-layer scheduling algorithm, both the nT spatial channels and the nf frequency channels contribute to the multiuser selection diversity gain. The optimal cross-layer scheduling algorithm for OFDMA/MISO is formulated, and the optimal solution is obtained. Because of the high computational complexity involved, we use some suboptimal search algorithms (such as the greedy algorithm and the genetic algorithm used in 6) to obtain the multiuser performance. The performance is compared with the DSCDMA/MISO systems, and it is found that signi cant gains of the OFDMA/MISO systems can be obtained because of the expanded dimension of multiuser diversity. From this, we conclude that combatting the fading from a point-to-point level is much less effective than that based on multiuser selection. In the context of multiuser performance, the physical layer should not suppress the uctuation of user data rate. Finally, we elaborate on the practical implementation issues of OFDMA systems with respect to the time and frequency synchronization requirements. Timing and frequency offsets of OFDMA-based systems in the uplink direction can be quite complicated because different users may have different residual timing and frequency offsets due to the variation in the propagation delay, transmitter frequency offset and mobile speed. The timing offsets among users may contribute to ISI between consecutive OFDM symbols if the maximum residual timing offsets among the K active users exceed the guard period NcyclicT0. On the other hand, if the maximum timing offset is within the guard period, the ISI can be completely eliminated because the timing offset is equivalent to a linear phase shift at the DFT outputs. On the other hand, frequency offsets among the K users will contribute to multiuser interference. Since different users may have different timing offsets and frequency offsets, it is not possible to apply correction at the base station receiver. Instead, the base station needs to estimate the frequency offsets and timing offsets for all the K users and instruct the individual mobile transmitters to compensate for these offsets.