Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability in .NET

Implementation code128b in .NET Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability
Visual .net code 128a scanneron .net
Using Barcode Control SDK for .net framework Control to generate, create, read, scan barcode image in .net framework applications.
Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability
Code 128 Code Set B barcode library in .net
using visual .net tointegrate uss code 128 on web,windows application
System Production Phase System Production Phase System Operations & Support (O&S) Phase System Operations & Support (O&S) Phase 1 System Fielding System Disposal Phase System Disposal Phase 2 3 System Disposal Period of Stabilized Failure System/Component Failure Rate Remains Relatively Constant Period of Increasing Failure System/Component Failure Rate Increases Due to Effects of Aging & Maintenance 4
scanning uss code 128 in .net
Using Barcode reader for .net vs 2010 Control to read, scan read, scan image in .net vs 2010 applications.
Hazard Rate h(t)
recognize barcode for .net
Using Barcode recognizer for .net framework Control to read, scan read, scan image in .net framework applications.
Period of Decreasing Failure Field Elimination of System/Component Defects Reduces Failure Rate
Bar Code barcode library on .net
using barcode maker for .net framework control to generate, create bar code image in .net framework applications.
Barcode Standards 128 barcode library with visual
use visual .net code 128 writer toincoporate code 128c for .net c#
Code128b barcode library with .net
using website toprint ansi/aim code 128 for web,windows application
Bathtub Paradigm
Control code 128 code set b image on
using vs .net tointegrate code128 for web,windows application
Render 1d with .net
use .net crystal linear 1d barcode generation toadd 1d for .net
Figure 50.2 Bathtub Curve Paradigm Equipment Failure Pro le
Build data matrix on .net
using barcode printing for visual .net crystal control to generate, create data matrix ecc200 image in visual .net crystal applications.
tronic components lead to the formulation of the Bathtub Curve. Examples of these components included vacuum tube and early semiconductor technologies that exhibited high failure rates. Many subject matter experts (SMEs) question the validity of the Bathtub Curve in today s world. Due to the higher component reliabilities available today, most systems become obsolete and are replaced or disposed of long before their useful service life pro le reaches the Period of Increasing Failure. Most computers will last for many years or decades. Yet, newer technologies drive the need to upgrade or replace computers every 2 3 years. Smith [1992] observes that the Bathtub Curve may provide an appropriate pro le for a few components. However, the Bathtub Curve has been ASSUMED to be applicable to more components than is supported by actual eld data measurements. Large, statistically valid sample sizes are required to establish age-reliability characteristics of components. Often, large populations of data are dif cult to obtain due to their proprietary nature, assuming they exist. Nelson [1990] also notes that the Bathtub Curve only represents a small percentage of his experiences. Anecdotal evidence suggests that most reliability work in the US is based on the Period of Stabilized Failure, primarily due to the simplicity of dealing with the constant hazard rate from negative exponential distributions. Although any decreasing or increasing exponential distribution can be used to model the three failure rate regions, the Weibull distribution typically provides more exibility in accurately shaping the characteristic pro le. Based on these observations, the validity of the Bathtub Curve may better serve as an instructional tool for describing curve tting than as one size ts all paradigm for every type of electronic equipment. Low Rate and Mass Production Systems. The discussion of the decreasing failure period of the Bathtub Curve does provide some key insights, especially in terms of systems planned for production. Figure 50.3 might represent the initial failure rate period for a rst article system and set of OPERATING ENVIRONMENT conditions. For example, assume the instantaneous failure rate or hazard rate at POWER ON is f0, which represents the mean of a statistically valid sample of rst article systems. During the System Design Segment, f0 is strictly an analytical estimate.
Use quick response code with .net
using barcode generating for vs .net crystal control to generate, create quick response code image in vs .net crystal applications.
50.3 System Reliability
Visual .net usd-8 integratedin .net
using .net toadd code11 with web,windows application
Failure Rate ( )
Initial Failure Rate Mean for a Given System and OPERATING ENVIIRONMENT Conditions
Control barcode pdf417 data for c#
to build pdf 417 and pdf 417 data, size, image with .net c# barcode sdk
Frequency Distributions about a Central Mean
European Article Number 13 printing on .net
generate, create ean13 none for .net projects
1 2 3
Data Matrix ECC200 creator with visual c#
use .net vs 2010 gs1 datamatrix barcode integrating toreceive datamatrix for .net c#
f2 t0 t1 t2
Render gs1 datamatrix barcode for c#
using an form crystal toreceive 2d data matrix barcode with web,windows application
Time matrix barcode writerfor .net
using barcode implementation for web control to generate, create matrix barcode image in web applications.
Decreasing Failure Period (DFP) Decreasing Failure Period (DFP)
Control upc a size in office excel
upc code size on microsoft excel
Figure 50.3 Electronic Equipment Failure Pro le
Control pdf417 image for word
use word documents pdf417 encoding tocreate pdf-417 2d barcode on word documents
Once we have a statistically valid sampling of rst article systems, we can validate the distribution with actual eld data. By correcting latent defects such as design errors and aws, component material defects, and workmanship process and method problems for a speci c serial number system, its failure rate should decrease thereby improving its reliability. The strategy is to posture the system design and manufacturing processes for a Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) failure rate near f2, not f0. From an infant mortality perspective, Figure 50.3 also illustrates the effects of a diminishing failure rate resulting from a component burn-in. Based on this premise, some organizations establish a burn-in strategy to speci c components for a prescribed number of hours prior to assembly to reduce infant mortality.
System/Component Mortality
Traditionally, complex systems were viewed as having a failure rate that decreased with time based on the frequency distribution of initial failures. These failures were referred to as infant mortality due to weak components. Therefore, the Decreasing Failure Period (DFP) was viewed as a burnin period to eliminate these failures. If the failure rate diminishes initially during the defect elimination phase, why not subject the system/component to an operational burn-in period at the factory Some System Developer or Production organizations do this. They know that mission critical components must achieve a speci ed level of reliability and perform a burn-in. Some organizations driven by pro tability may tend to rebuff this extra burn-in as follows: 1. Unnecessary due to the higher reliability of today s components. 2. Consumes investment resources with no immediate return.