Event 1 tExec Task Initiation in .NET

Assign barcode 128 in .NET Event 1 tExec Task Initiation
Event 1 tExec Task Initiation
Visual Studio .NET code128 readeron .net
Using Barcode Control SDK for Visual Studio .NET Control to generate, create, read, scan barcode image in Visual Studio .NET applications.
tAllocation tMargin
Visual .net code 128 code set c printeron .net
generate, create barcode 128 none on .net projects
Event 2
Code 128 Code Set B scanner on .net
Using Barcode scanner for .NET Control to read, scan read, scan image in .NET applications.
Task A Time Allocation Maximum Budgeted Performance
Barcode barcode library with .net
using visual studio .net todisplay bar code for asp.net web,windows application
Queue Time Transport Time
Incoporate bar code for .net
using .net crystal touse barcode for asp.net web,windows application
Design Margin
Control code-128c image in visual c#
use .net code 128 code set b development tocompose code 128 code set b for .net c#
Task Completion
Aspx.cs Page code 128b generationon .net
use asp.net web pages code-128c integrating toattach uss code 128 on .net
Processing Time
Control code 128b data on visual basic.net
to access code 128 code set b and code 128c data, size, image with vb.net barcode sdk
Early Finish
PDF417 development with .net
use vs .net crystal pdf 417 printer toadd barcode pdf417 on .net
Mean (mA) Finish
UPC-A barcode library on .net
use visual .net upc-a supplement 2 integrated toassign upc code on .net
Late Finish
Make code 128b with .net
using barcode development for visual studio .net crystal control to generate, create code 128c image in visual studio .net crystal applications.
Task Execution Performance
Standard 2 Of 5 generation with .net
using .net vs 2010 crystal tobuild barcode 25 with asp.net web,windows application
tMin. tMean tBudget -3s +3s tMargin
Incoporate upc code on java
using java toencode upc-a supplement 2 on asp.net web,windows application
Figure 49.7 Task Timeline Elements
Office Word ansi/aim code 128 developmenton office word
using word documents toget barcode standards 128 on asp.net web,windows application
49.6 Applying Statistics to Multi-Task System Performance
SQL Reporting Service denso qr bar code implementationon .net
using barcode creator for ssrs control to generate, create qr-code image in ssrs applications.
bution, we also expect the task to be completed no sooner than the -3s point the early nish point. If we translate this analysis into the Requirements Domain Solution, we generate a requirements statement that captures the capability and its associated performance allocation. Let s suppose that Capability B requires that Capability A complete processing and transmit data within 250 milliseconds AFTER Event 1 occurs. Consider the following example of a speci cation requirement statement.
Bar Code barcode library for excel spreadsheets
using excel spreadsheets toproduce bar code with asp.net web,windows application
When event 1 occurs, (Capability A) shall process the incoming data and transmit the results to (Capability B) within 250 milliseconds.
Web Crystal qr code jis x 0510 creatorin vb
using asp.net website crystal todevelop qrcode with asp.net web,windows application
Now let s suppose that Capability B requires receipt of the data within a window of time between 240 milliseconds and 260 milliseconds. The requirement might read as follows:
Qr Codes barcode library with vb.net
use .net qr-code generator toget qrcode for visual basic.net
Control 3 of 9 barcode data for visual basic
to display code 39 and code-39 data, size, image with vb.net barcode sdk
When event 1 occurs, (Capability A) shall process the incoming data and transmit the results to (Capability B) within 250 10 milliseconds.
Guidepost 49.2 Our discussion emphasizes how overall system task performance can vary. To understand how this variation occurs, let s take it one step further and discuss it relative to the key task phases.
Our previous discussion focused on the performance of a single capability. If the statistical variations for a single capability are aggregated for a multi-level system, we can easily see how this impacts overall system performance. We can illustrate this by the example shown in Figure 49.8. Let s assume we have an overall task called Perform Task A. The purpose of Task A is to perform a computation using variable inputs, I1 and I2, and produce a computed value as an output. The key point of our discussion here is to illustrate time-based statistical variances to complete processing.
Let s assume that Task A consists of two subtasks, Subtask A1 and Subtask A2. Subtask A1 enters inputs I1 and I2. Each input, I1 and I2, has values that vary about a mean.
When Subtask A1 is initiated, it produces a response within tA1Mean that varies from tA1Min to tA1Max. The output of Subtask A1 serves as an input to Subtask A2. Subtask A2 produces a response within tA2Mean that may occur as early as tA2Min or as late as tA2Max. If we investigate the overall performance of Task A, we nd that Task A is computed within tCompute as indicated by the central mean. The overall Task A performance is determined by the statistical variance of the summation of Subtask A1 and Subtask A2 processing times.
System Performance Analysis, Budgets, and Safety Margins
Perform Task A
-3s +3s -3s +3s
Value tCompute
Variable Input I1 Perform Perform SubTask A1 SubTask A1 Task A1 Cycle Time Mean (mA1)
-3s +3s
Perform Perform SubTask A2 SubTask A2 Task A2 Cycle Time Mean (mA2)
Value tA1Min. tA1Mean tA1Max. tA1Transport
-3s +3s
Variable Input I2
tA2Mean tA2Max. tA2Transport
Figure 49.8 Task Timeline (MET) Statistical Analysis
Guidepost 49.3 We have seen how statistical variations in inputs and processing affect system performance from a timing perspective. Similar methods are applied to the statistical variations of inputs 1 and 2 as independent variables over a range of values. The point of our discussion is to heighten your awareness of these variances. THINK about and CONSIDER statistical variability when allocating performance budgets and margins as well as analyzing data produced by the system to determine compliance with requirements. Referral For more information about statistical variability, refer to 48 on Statistical In uences on System Design Practices. Given this understanding, let s return to a previous discussion about applying statistical variations to phases of a task.
In our earlier discussion of task phases consisting of queue time, capability performance time, and transport time we identi ed the various time segments within each phase. Let s examine how statistical in uences affect those phases. Figure 49.9 serves as the focal point for our discussion. The central part of the gure represents an overall task and its respective queue time, processing time, and transport time phases. Below each phase is a statistical representation of the execution time. The top portion of the chart illustrates the aggregate performance of the overall task execution.